Premier Jorge del Castillo has denied all means have encouraged their son or the channel on which advertising works by giving the State. Moreover, it has removed the body noting that he is the holder of the statement Ministry of Interior. Indirectly pen blew his party colleague Luis Alva Castro which had ordered to be placed advertising in the amount of RBC S/.283, 967.
Del Castillo, political trejo has confirmed, however, attend the Audit Committee to explain that he is clean of dust and straw. Hildebrandt in the program had the luxury to say that he is "a Democrat with a history" that can not make the mistake of using your store of influence "even more the case of" sums on TV are quibbles.
Del Castillo is right, because according to law, who should answer for this scandal is Alva Castro. However, our Prime Minister himself is politically responsible for the mismanagement of the advertising policy. Don Huey (ex gorgogito) fell silent with Hildebrandt when the advertising analyzing the distribution of the ministry of Interior snapped: "You will not convince or aa caparecuita RBC has more (advertising) that trade." Premier
Where is the owner or another responsible for the statement is on Channel 7. The shocking conclusion of the program by Guillermo Giacosa gone unnoticed, but is equal to or worse than what happened with the case of RBC. If the opposition had more interest and (eggs), Del Castillo quietly yes that would be in real trouble.
Just Giacosa review the complaint. Both in his column last Saturday as of yesterday and the interview with Peru 21 last Sunday, reporting serious events on the state channel management and communication policy of the APRA government. Here is a summary:
- "Those who think differently (on Channel 7) on. And, therefore, politely, citing lack of budget, which makes me wonder how they get paid to advisers, told me on 31 March that from 1 April, was beyond my modest program. " (But its cost of production was one of the cheapest in the channel)
- "In the past eight years (Channel 7) was my home. And as such I want and I'll keep trying. (...) But times change and faces , too. Not surprisingly a new face, but today, more than once, I had the feeling of having entered a wrong place. "They are the advisors," I still say those who know. And I think how good, with many advisers, things will get better! For advisers, of course, because what is the channel, is ceasing to be an instrument of the state to become an instrument of government.
My case is only one more against anti-democratic vocation install the coral unanimously that currently characterizes much of the national press. - If it was always 'anti', why bother in just 7?
There was a change in government and I think they came to make the necessary changes. One was silence people who disagree with them.
- Did they tell you not to touch issues that bother the government?
No. But the channel had a program when they did not like, curiously had technical flaws. That happened a few times with my program. The thing was asolapada .
- He spoke with the chairman about what happened?
To Mr. Manrique (Carlos Manrique Negron, chairman of TV Peru) do not know. What I have seen are many new faces, 'advisors'. Then I say: how is money to many advisers and no money for an expensive program? I think the idea is to transform the Channel 7 in a private channel. That said , but do not know if it's true.
"You said the channel 7 is no longer the state but the Government ...
That is the idea that I find repugnant . Fujimori, as the press was arranged, did not mind the channel. So you worked freely. At the time of Paniagua and Toledo got nobody. Now, suddenly, make this the government channel oe interrupt programming all the time.
- "We spent the last stage without interviewing Fujimori, the record library, a single supporter of the Japanese kamikaze. They built the program when we think about the video Kouri-Montesinos, but in line with the events, which replenished as marking time of his own weakness. The time was splendid Paniagua, and Toledo were objective information and absolute freedom to do and undo as our conscience dictates. "
What's really happening in the head APRA government? Are we regressed to Fujimori media?
Who is lying: POPE PREMIER OR YOUR CHILD WANTS TO FEED?
And high the son of the premier wants to buy a private channel without having the money or the "permission of his father." Today on the radio program of CH, the Prime Minister attacked for no reason the newspaper's First disqualified for allegedly being a cover Humala and publish the statements of his son. "It's a hoax that cover," said del Castillo said the site that made him the first to explain how your child plans to buy more than 40% of shares of RBC.
"My son has no interest or money to buy. I do not think that Bolment want to sell. Has misinterpreted his statements, "said Del Castillo, Hildebrandt advantage that had not seen the interview he gave to Castle Miguelín Utero TV .
In the previous post that reprinted his remarks after the first half and played without citing the Utero TV source. The son of Prime Minister clearly said: "We are with an option to purchase a package of actions, which will be realized to the extent that they meet the goals of management. It would be a nice investment. There is 40%, but much more. "
Del Castillo has rejurado jury is not behind the purchase of 11 and lobbies to promote by advertising the trough that wants to buy his son: "I'm not behind the channel to mix with echos of that nature. I'm not into that. I'm not into the media. I'm not giving out jams." has also promised to César Hildebrandt that if the Comptroller or the Congress shows that favored his son, he "quit" immediately to the office. We'll see. For now should respond to the serious allegations and the testimony of Guillermo Giacosa.
MORE: Interview with Guillermo Giacosa in Utero Tv
The Walrus deflates arguments "white television" and successful the "jotitas of Tele"
Miguel del Castillo state advertising + + Alan García + + jorge delCastillo RBC + channel 11 pepitaspuntocom
0 comments:
Post a Comment